- Will they be building near you?
- Will it be a sustainable development?
- Will local residents have a say?
Item 3 on the Agenda of the plenary session
held last Month was the motion to approve "Modification No 2 of PGOU and
Adaptation of Normas for Bédar".
After receiving her notification about the upcoming meeting on
the Wednesday before the Council Meeting, Ana Rubio, the lead councillor for the Opposition, went to the town
hall to research the subject. At the meeting
we held before the pleno to decide on how we would be voting, Ana said she was
unable to understand what the proposed changes would be and their impact on
residents.
So at the plenary
meeting itself, prior to the vote, we asked for the
establishment of a Planning Information Commission which could clarify the
proposed changes in a language understandable by the average resident. These information commissions are obligatory
by law in towns larger than 5000 population so that Opposition parties can
remain informed about the goings-on of the town hall. In Bédar, the Mayor refuses to form the
information commissions, arguing that to do so would duplicate the work that
goes on during the plenary meetings. We
disagree since by the time the matters are brought up at the plenaries, after a
brief debate, they are voted on immediately.
In the event, the
Mayor turned down our suggestion, saying that these matters were quite
complicated, therefore implying that they could not be made
understandable. The only explanation he
gave at the plenary was that because parts of Bédar are now included in the
LIC (Lugar de Interés Comunitario – zone protected by the European Union which
cannot be built on), they had been advised to make changes in the PGOU so that
people whose land is affected can still carry out entrepreneurial activities. He referred in particular to the Department of
Agriculture and Livestock without giving any further explanations.
As the PSOE has an
absolute majority, the motion was carried by five votes to three.
So, we are now no more the wiser about what this item involves. I’ve been a town councillor for about six months now and I already realise that if you want to find out anything in Bédar, you have to take your own initiatives. Judging by the comments you’ve been giving us, I think I’m not alone in wanting to understand more, even if we’re not being invited to participate in formulating the changes.
Therefore we are
currently talking with some local English-speaking planning specialists who want to arranging a workshop for all interested parties. The purpose of this workshop will be to learn
what the current PGOU (Plan General de Ordenación Urbanística) and proposed
modifications are, to discuss what the proposed changes will mean for the
municipality and to answer any questions that an individual homeowner may have
about their particular situation. We
will let you know through this blog about the workshop details when we have
them.
1 comment:
Thankyou for your blog as it is becoming increasingly clear that the town hall of Bedar has forgotten it is an elected public office and that it exists under a democratic rule in Spain.Its duty is to work and support the village and the people of the area.It is not there for the benefit of the selected few.
Regarding the points from the meeting. First of all congratulations to the families who won their case. Now, who pays for the compensation they are entitled to due to the mayor's mistakes? Does the money come out of the local budget and if so can the mayor be held accountable in some way for his error of judgement?
Secondly the matter of the road being closed on a Wednesday. The alternative access to the village, the well used road to the campo de futbol is in a precarious state and there has already been one death there. It takes a stong person to back down and admit when they are wrong so let's see if sense will prevail and the wishes of the public are acted upon and the market with all the illegal stalls is moved to a more suitable position.
Post a Comment